The guarantee binds the guarantee to the lessor who has the right to demand the performance of certain obligations included in the terms and conditions. These may relate to the payment of rent, prices, damages and legal costs. The guarantee may agree that the lessor can claim directly from the guarantee all the sums earned by the tenant without asserting the rights of the tenant. In this case, the owner argued that the words “… all funds that the principal debtor may owe to the creditor, now or from time to time, and that arise from a lease… was sufficiently responsible for the guarantee to be held responsible for all rents that may result from future leases. However, the Tribunal found (in our view too relevant) that the guarantee was limited to the first lease between L and Mr. In support of its explanatory statement, the Tribunal found that the term “executed” clearly referred to a lease agreement already entered into and not to a contract to be entered into in the future. In addition, the Tribunal found that the terms “from time to time” related to funds owed in the original lease and not to funds that could be due under future leases. The Tribunal also found that if the guarantee were to apply to future leases that did not yet exist at the time the guarantee was concluded, it should be specifically mentioned. A guarantee agreement is an important instrument used by credit providers to limit the risk of lending.
It is therefore important to determine whether a bonding agreement is a credit contract within the meaning of the National Credit Act. Whether the guarantee agreements fall within the scope of the NCA depends on whether or not the main agreement is regulated by the AAFC. On May 29, 2015, in a Supreme Court of Appeal decision, owner Dormell Properties 282 CC was tried. Alwyn Gideon Bamberger was the sole director of Edulyn (Pty) Ltd, the tenant who signed the lease offer on behalf of Edulyn. He also signed as a surety for Edulyn`s obligations in the lease. The bail ceremony was made as an appendix to the lease, but the lessor refrained from signing the lease. The guarantor stated that he had erred in not realizing that by signing the guarantee obligation, he was liable in his personal capacity. The Tribunal found that the error was clearly due to his own recklessness and inattention and that he was aware of the determination of the guarantee. The court decided that the guarantee to the lessor to the tune of R228538.12, including interest of 11% per annum from the date of judgment until the day of the final payment and R44673.75 at the legal interest rate from the date of delivery of the cargo until the day of payment. Consequently, the importance of concluding a guarantee agreement with a clear understanding of the terms of the contract and its own commitments cannot be overstated. Mandatory formalities necessary for the validity of the Alienation of the Country – S (2) (1) of the Alienation Act: o Must be included in an alienation signed by Dens / its agents on written authorization – including sale, exchange and donation – Object: Promote legal certainty with regard to the authenticity and content of contractual exceptions: – Business executives should not be allowed in writing to sign.
Viajes Bojorquez 2015 Diseño y Desarrollo por Hydis